Free tool · For HR, benefits leads, brokers and PEOs
Employer contribution cost model
Open enrollment is the window where this gets decided. Model what a Trump Account
contribution would actually cost at your headcount and participation rate — and see which
questions belong to benefits counsel rather than to a spreadsheet.
Proposed, not final — verified 24 August 2026. Employer-contribution and
nondiscrimination rules for this program were published as
proposed regulations on 11 August 2026 and are open for comment until
25 September 2026. Final §530A regulations are not published. Guidance stating
these generally are not ERISA pension plans exists and can evolve. Model with that in
mind: the arithmetic below is sound, the rules underneath it are not yet settled. Sources are
linked at the foot of this page.
$0Estimated annual contribution cost
0Employees expected to participate
$0Cost per benefits-eligible employee
Participation sensitivity
Take-up is the number nobody can predict, so it is the
number worth bracketing rather than guessing. Your entered rate is highlighted.
Take-up
Participants
Annual cost
The line item most employers forget
What belongs to benefits counsel, not to this model
This model does arithmetic
on your numbers. It cannot answer any of the following, and neither can any other web page —
these depend on your plan documents, your workforce composition, and rules that are still
being written. Take this list to your benefits counsel:
Nondiscrimination. Whether the design creates a testing issue given
who in your workforce actually has eligible children. Rules here are proposed, not final.
Plan characterization. Whether the arrangement sits inside an existing
plan or stands alone, and what that means for your documents and filings.
ERISA status for your arrangement. General guidance exists.
General guidance is not a determination about your plan, and it can evolve.
Payroll and reporting mechanics. How the amount flows, what gets
reported, on which form, by whom.
Interaction with your existing benefits and any cafeteria-plan treatment.
Multi-state workforce. State treatment varies and is unsettled.
What you commit to if the rules change mid-year — the one nobody asks
until it happens.
The question this raises
The budget number is the easy part.
The parts that actually determine whether this lands well:
What this model does not do
It does not model payroll taxes or your specific tax treatment.
It does not model state treatment. It varies and is unsettled.
It is not a compliance review and it is not benefits, tax, or legal advice.
It does not know your plan documents, your workforce composition, or your carrier arrangements.
Its take-up figure is your estimate, not a benchmark. We do not have
credible take-up data for a program this new, and we are not going to invent one.
If a number matters to your decision and isn't in this model,
assume the model doesn't handle it.
Sources
Each default is linked to the primary source it comes from, with that source's date.
Two of the four are proposed rules and are labelled as such.
$2,500 per employee per year, excludable from the employee's income under
§128, indexed only after 2027 —
REG-101355-26, Federal Register 11 August 2026.
Proposed. Comments close 25 September 2026.
Nondiscrimination rules — same document, same status.
Proposed.
Generally not “employee pension benefit plans” under ERISA §3(2),
where participation is voluntary, the employer does not control investments, does not
endorse, and receives no compensation beyond reasonable fees —
DOL Technical Release 2026-02, 17 June 2026.
$5,000 combined annual cap per child, indexed after 2027; the $1,000
federal deposit sits on top of it —
IRS Notice 2025-68 and IRS, Trump Accounts.
The Sovereign Academy is not affiliated with or endorsed by the U.S. government, the
Treasury, the IRS, or the Trump Accounts program.
General education for benefits decision-makers. Not benefits, tax, legal, or compliance advice.
Employer rules for this program are proposed and not final. Nothing entered here is stored or
transmitted.